Pokemon TCG Pocket's Trading Feature Faces Backlash, Prompts Developer Response

DeNA, the developer of Pokemon TCG Pocket, has pledged improvements to the game's trading feature following significant player criticism. The controversy centers around the recent implementation of the trading system, released on January 29, 2025, alongside the Space-Time Smackdown booster packs.

High Cost of Trade Tokens Fuels Player Dissatisfaction

The core complaint revolves around the exorbitant cost of acquiring trade tokens, the in-game currency required for trading. Players can only trade 1-4 Diamond and 1-Star rarity cards from Genetic Apex and Mythical Island packs. While helpful for Pokedex completion, the limitations and high token costs have angered many. Obtaining sufficient tokens necessitates sacrificing higher-rarity cards, creating a frustrating loop for players aiming to complete their collections. For example, trading a 4-Diamond card requires 500 tokens, while selling a 1-Star card yields only 100.

DeNA acknowledged the negative feedback on February 1st, 2025, via a Twitter (X) post, stating they are actively exploring solutions. They intend to introduce additional ways to earn trade tokens, including event-based distributions. Currently, only 1-Star cards are tradable.

The developer explained the stringent rules were implemented to prevent bot abuse and multi-account exploitation, aiming to balance fairness and the core collecting aspect of the game.

Genetic Apex Booster Pack Accessibility Concerns

A separate issue arose concerning the apparent disappearance of Genetic Apex booster packs from the main screen following the Space-Time Smackdown release. Reddit discussions highlighted player anxieties. However, the packs remain accessible via a less prominent "Select other booster packs" option.

While potentially a design oversight, some players suspected deliberate obfuscation to promote the newer packs. Suggestions for improving the home screen's clarity to display all available booster packs have been made. DeNA has yet to directly address this issue.